T

tkurtz

Member

Last active 1 hour ago

  1. 2 hours ago
    Wed Sep 19 19:35:08 2018

    I tried again with the following custom scheme and it failed.

  2. 5 hours ago
    Wed Sep 19 16:30:44 2018

    Tried imaging it without any custom partitioning - success. Going to try setting the custom scheme with MB as suggested (instead of the 20gb I had originally).

  3. 6 hours ago
    Wed Sep 19 15:57:21 2018

    Okay, I'll try that now. No, haven't tried without custom sizes - I can try as a troubleshooting step but that would result in a pretty unusable partitioning scheme.

    I currently have the custom size set to way bigger then required (its set to 20 gb), but I'll try chaning to it to MB.

  4. 7 hours ago
    Wed Sep 19 14:39:18 2018

    Log from my latest deployment attempt, the schema from the upload (that I modified based off my other post), and the export schema I am trying to use.

  5. yesterday
    Tue Sep 18 19:09:42 2018

    I get the following error at the end of a deploy log - the system only boots into emergency mode. Any ideas? I wonder if it's related to https://forum.clonedeploy.org/845-error-while-expanding-volume-group-system-nullreferenceexceptio

    Warning! Secondary partition table overlaps the last partition by
    33 blocks!
    You will need to delete this partition or resize it in another utility.
    Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 2000409264 sectors, 953.9 GiB
    Logical sector size: 512 bytes
    Disk identifier (GUID): 7C0359B6-126B-48C0-BE5D-77C2B2FCFB01
    Partition table holds up to 128 entries
    First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 2000409230
    Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
    Total free space is 2014 sectors (1007.0 KiB)
     
    Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
    1 2048 2099199 1024.0 MiB 8300 Linux filesystem
    2 2099200 2000409263 952.9 GiB 8E00 Linux LVM
  6. 2 days ago
    Mon Sep 17 20:10:41 2018

    I managed to compare it to the last time you fixed it, and was able to at least get the error to go away. Going to test deploying it and see what happens.

  7. Mon Sep 17 19:29:21 2018

    Hello again - I captured another image with custom partitioning like before and I am getting the same error. Can you take a look? Schema attached.

  8. 3 months ago
    Mon Jun 18 14:11:08 2018
    T tkurtz posted in Dynamic Schema Sizing?.

    Oh, I found how to have multiple profiles. That probably solves the problem for me. Wish me luck on trying to deploy this monstrosity....

  9. Mon Jun 18 13:47:44 2018
    T tkurtz started the conversation Dynamic Schema Sizing?.

    Hello,

    Is it possible to have an image schema that is dynamic depending on the size of the hardware?

    I have a reference Linux image that I built on a 20gb HDD VM, and I am modifying the slightly complex partitioning for deployment to larger hard drives.

    Is it possible to do something like....
    /boot - 1.5 gb static
    /home - 35% of total hdd space, or 20gb, whichever is smaller
    /var - 15% of total hdd space, or 10gb, whichever is smaller
    / - rest of the available space

    If that's not possible, is it possible to have two deployment schemes for the same image? So I could create one for large hard drives with the smaller values, and one based on percentages?

  10. Mon Jun 18 13:32:28 2018

    Wanted to circle back and let you know how much I appreciate how quickly you responded.

View more